Sunday, 22 February 2009

8- Robert Rauschenberg





Rauschenberg's approach was sometimes called "Neo-Dada," a label he shared with the painter, close friend, and sometime lover Jasper Johns.[17] Rauschenberg's oft-repeated quote that he wanted to work "in the gap between art and life" suggested a questioning of the distinction between art objects and everyday objects, reminiscent of the issues raised by the notorious "Fountain," by Dada pioneer, Marcel Duchamp. At the same time, Johns' paintings of numerals, flags, and the like, were reprising Duchamp's message of the role of the observer in creating art's meaning.
Alternatively, in 1961, Rauschenberg took a step in what could be considered the opposite direction by championing the role of creator in creating art's meaning. Rauschenberg was invited to participate in an exhibition at the Galerie Iris Clert, where artists were to create and display a portrait of the owner, Iris Clert. Rauschenberg's submission consisted of a telegram sent to the gallery declaring "This is a portrait of Iris Clert if I say so."


Robert Rauschenberg, Riding Bikes, Berlin, Germany, 1998.
By 1962, Rauschenberg's paintings were beginning to incorporate not only found objects but found images as well - photographs transferred to the canvas by means of the silkscreen process. Previously used only in commercial applications, silkscreen allowed Rauschenberg to address the multiple reproducibility of images, and the consequent flattening of experience that that implies. In this respect, his work is contemporaneous with that of Andy Warhol, and both Rauschenberg and Johns are frequently cited as important forerunners of American Pop Art.
In 1966, Billy Klüver and Rauschenberg officially launched Experiments in Art and Technology (E.A.T.) a non-profit organization established to promote collaborations between artists and engineers.
In 1984, Rauschenberg announced his Rauschenberg Overseas Culture Interchange, or ROCI, at the United Nations. This would culminate in a seven year, ten country tour to encourage "world peace and understanding," through Mexico, Chile, Venezuela, Beijing, Lhasa (Tibet), Japan, Cuba, Soviet Union, Berlin, and Malaysia in which he left a piece of art, and was influenced by the cultures he visited. Paintings, often on reflective surfaces, as well as drawings, photographs, assemblages and other multimedia were produced, inspired by these surroundings, and this was considered some of his strongest works. The ROCI venture, supported by the National Gallery of Art in Washington, D.C., went on view in 1991.
In 1986, he was commissioned by BMW to paint a full size BMW 635 CSi for the sixth installment of the famed BMW Art Car Project. Rauschenberg's contribution was the first to include the wheels into the project, as well as incorporating previous works of art into the design.
In addition to painting and sculpture, Rauschenberg's career has also included significant contributions to printmaking and Performance Art. He also won a Grammy Award for his album design of Talking Heads' album Speaking in Tongues. As of 2003 he worked from his home and studio in Captiva, Florida.
In a famously cited incident of 1953, Rauschenberg erased a drawing by de Kooning, which he obtained from his colleague for the express purpose of erasing it as an artistic statement. The result is titled Erased de Kooning.[18][19] In 1964 Rauschenberg was the first American artist to win the Grand Prize at the Venice Biennale (Mark Tobey and James Whistler had previously won the Painting Prize). After that time, he enjoyed a rare degree of institutional support. In 1951 Rauschenberg had his first one-man show at the Betty Parsons Gallery[20] and in 1954 had a second one-man show at the Charles Egan Gallery.[21]

Rauschenberg ' e bir noktada geri donecegim.

6- Paul Klee




Klee'yi ilk bayindirlik ve iskan bakanliginin duvarlarinda gormustum, cok kucukken.

5- Joseph Beuys







bir fluxuscu daha, viva la fluxus!

4- gerard richter



fazla uzakta aramaya gerek yok, wikipediadan kisa bir alinti

Richter's work is full of tension between depicted reality and the actuality of painting: process and material. From the 1950s and his time in Eastern Germany's Dresden, dresden, gitmeden gittigimi sandigim yerlerden birtanesi. "photographic imagery"the artist has been known for his photo-paintings, particularly his landscapes, and his involved abstract paintings. Despite the scope of this body of work—which is commonly misunderstood as polar—Richter's paintings consistently support a unified theme that is twofold: 1. Images (and ideas and ideals) are static, superficial, unachievable and are to be doubted; and, 2. Reality is a process of imagination, material creation and revision. Richter’s subject is the range of relationships between illusion and this reality, his painting.
Richter has stated that the use of photographic imagery as a starting point for his early paintings resulted from an attempt to escape the complicated process of deciding what to paint, along with the critical and theoretical implications accompanying such decisions within the context of a modernist discourse. To achieve this, Richter began amassing photos from magazines, books, etc, many of which became the subject matter of his early photography-based paintings. Thus the Atlas was born; a collection of thousands of photographs, and cropped magazine and newspaper images, compiled in a single volume.

bu link de benden: gadamer the relevance of the beautiful
http://www.amazon.com/Relevance-Beautiful-Other-Essays/dp/0521339537

3- bruce nauman






listedeki en favorilerimden biri, ozellikle neonlari, dili diline dolamasi, concrete poetrisi, instructionlari, kitaplari, yuruyusu, sesleri ama - en cok da neonlari. en az da performanslari, ama bu benim defektim, performans sanatlarina olan inancimin azligindan kaynaklaniyor, tiyatro modern dans falan da dahil izlemeye tahammul edemiyorum. biraz baba-sci-fi iliskisi gibi, eminim disarda bilimkurgu seven cool babalar vardir ama bizim mahallede yok, neyse nauman a donersek, bakalim mahalle ne demis:


SHOULD ART BE SEEN AND NOT heard? An old-fashioned notion--the catalog to the Bruce Nauman retrospective, currently at New York City's Museum of Modern Art, has a human ear on its cover. And indeed, no show was ever noisier. Go in, and you hit a wall of sound, all disagreeable: moanings and groanings; the prolonged squeak of something being dragged over a hard surface, like a knife on a plate; repetitious rock drumming; voices reciting mantra-like inanities; and (in its own room full of TV monitors titled Clown Torture) the hoarse voice of Nauman, dressed as a clown, in a baggy suit of vertical stripes that slyly recalls the garb of concentration-camp prisoners, shrieking, "No, no, no, nonono!" while writhing and jerking on the floor.

BEING A NUISANCE
By ROBERT HUGHES

Nauman, beyond much dispute, is the most influential American artist of his generation. Born in 1941, he is of the same artistic age as Eva Hesse, Richard Serra and Susan Rothenberg (whom he married in 1989), but the artists whose work he most counts for are younger; it is safe to say that hardly a corner of the mix of idioms at the end of the 1980s, from video to body pieces to process art to language games of various sorts, escaped Nauman's influence.

There's no mystery about why this should be so. What Nauman practices is a form of psychic primitivism, or atavism if you prefer. His art is chiefly about two states: compulsion and regression. When you see a videotape of him smearing his face with black or green greasepaint, you aren't sure whether he's disguising himself or simulating the fecal games of a backward child. Autism is the governing metaphor of his work's "look"--the long-winded rituals of trivial movement, the ejaculatory phrases, the bouts of ungovernable rage.

He is therefore a kind of guru to artists who seek gnomic "enactments" of pain, are obsessed by splits between private and public identity--including their own feelings of victimization--and treat the body as canvas. Not for nothing does one of Nauman's video pieces feature a bewildered rat in a Plexiglas maze, scuttling about under the bombardment of rock drumming. It's Nauman's idea of the relationship between artist and audience. The artist as hero is long gone from American culture, and the artist as social critic is ineffective, but Nauman, with the example of Dada before him and a slackly therapeutic culture all around, has cut himself a different role: the artist as nuisance.

Nauman doesn't think art has much to do with pleasure. Just about everything that could turn you off is catnip to him: aggro, solipsism, tension, repetition, torpor and bad jokes that may have come out of a misanthrope's fortune cookie. Boredom too. Try watching a fuzzy tape of Nauman overstretching a simple phallic pun by very slowly "manipulating" a long fluorescent tube. You don't so much enjoy this show as endure it; you get through it. Then, in the coffee shop, you peruse the catalog and find such hyperbolic drivel as this, by co-curator Kathy Halbreich: "Like the great 17th century metaphysical poet John Donne, who, faced with a world of expanding information and concomitant chaos, mastered paradox through meditation.Bruce Nauman creates art that is a drama of a particularly physical sort of imagining." Well, yes: remember Black Balls, 1969, eight minutes of Nauman's fingers rubbing black pigment in close-up on his scrotum? "O my America! my new-found land."

http://www.tate.org.uk/modern/exhibitions/nauman/

link: Meredith Monk,

Instructions

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qml505hxp_c

March 2, 1970
Bruce Nauman

Drill a hole into the heart of a large tree and insert a microphone. Mount the amplifier and speaker in an empty room and adjust the volume to make audible any sound that might come from the tree.
September, 1969

Drill a hole about a mile into the earth and drop a microphone to within a few feet of the bottom. Mount the amplifier and speaker in a very large empty room and adjust the volume to make audible any sounds that might come from the cavity.
September, 1969


to listen : http://www.ubu.com/sound/monk.html

link: samuel beckett

Mar 16th 2006
From The Economist print edition

“NOTHING is funnier than unhappiness,” says Nell, an immobile, daffy dustbin-dweller, in Samuel Beckett's play “Endgame”. For Beckett, an Irish playwright born 100 years ago who won the Nobel prize in literature in 1969, adversity and decrepitude were a rich source of humour. The frequently heard charge, that his stuff is morbid and joyless, is altogether wide of the mark.

London and Dublin are celebrating his centenary with festivals that kick off this Sunday. A highlight in both cities will be a revival of the 1984 production, overseen by Beckett himself, of “Waiting for Godot”, his best-known work and possibly the most influential play of the 20th century. “Godot” baffled audiences and critics when it was first performed, in French, in Paris in 1953. Though the play had its champions from the start, the verdict of an Irish critic, Vivian Mercier, that “Godot” is a play in which “nothing happens, twice” stuck to its author like a curse. …

2- pablo picasso

geciyoruz


link: Georges Braque link: Marshall McLuhan link: hot and cold media link: Alexis de Tocqueville

1- andy warhol


ben istemesem bile o her yerde, ustune yazilanlar artik "andimiz" tadinda, okurken dedikodu degilse dinlemek bile gelmiyor icimden, factory girldeki sienna miller guzeldi ve fakat.
fresh bir link bulmak basli basina bir mission, eminim vardir ama, benim zamanim yok daha 99 tane var
bu sebepten karsinizda neseli mi neseli Claes Oldenburg ve bu sene hayatini kaybeden karisi (kadinin adi yok)








The artistic team of Coosje van Bruggen and Claes Oldenburg has to date executed more than forty large-scale projects, which have been sited in various urban surroundings in Europe, Asia, and the United States:

art facts top 100

An artist's career depends very much on the success of his or her exhibitions.

Exhibitions listed on Artfacts.Net™ rate the different artists with a points system, which indicate the amount of attention each particular artist has received from art institutions. These points help to determine the artist's future auction and gallery sales.

The ranking method is a valuable tool that enables users of Artfacts.Net™ to track upcoming trends in the market.

art facts top 100

Name Ranking 2008 Points 2008 Links
Andy Warhol 1928-1987 US 1 ±0 483,139.38 +46,253.26
Pablo Picasso 1881-1973 ES 2 ±0 450,847.16 +43,369.32
Bruce Nauman *1941 (68) US 3 ±0 272,692.97 +27,785.58
Gerhard Richter *1932 (77) DE 4 ±0 247,041.44 +22,884.75
Joseph Beuys 1921-1986 DE 5 ±0 219,617.41 +28,104.97
Paul Klee 1879-1940 DE 6 ±0 210,476.69 +24,632.60
Robert Rauschenberg 1925-2008 US 7 ±0 192,643.83 +16,771.58
Sol LeWitt 1928-2007 US 8 +2 189,519.73 +21,190.46
Cindy Sherman *1954 (55) US 9 -1 186,145.05 +13,139.89
Henri Matisse 1869-1954 FR 10 -1 183,755.69 +13,715.61
Ed Ruscha *1937 (72) US 11 ±0 178,963.34 +23,212.75
Louise Bourgeois *1911 (98) FR 12 ±0 176,424.62 +20,880.28
Joàn Miró 1893-1983 ES 13 +1 174,108.02 +24,366.61
Sigmar Polke *1941 (68) PL 14 +1 165,166.31 +16,312.15
Roy Lichtenstein 1923-1997 US 15 -2 164,060.31 +9,066.54
Martin Kippenberger 1953-1997 DE 16 ±0 161,838.67 +15,328.97
Max Ernst 1891-1976 DE 17 +6 151,654.61 +26,923.20
Georg Baselitz *1938 (71) DE 18 ±0 149,971.27 +16,150.58
Wassily Kandinsky 1866-1944 RU 19 ±0 148,786.73 +18,109.59
Olafur Eliasson *1967 (42) DK 20 +1 148,731.03 +21,408.76
Andreas Gursky *1955 (54) DE 21 -4 148,123.23 +9,405.45
Man Ray 1890-1976 US 22 +8 147,622.05 +31,965.18
Marcel Duchamp 1887-1968 FR 23 +11 142,695.95 +29,739.61
Fischli & Weiss *1979 (30) CH 24 -4 142,451.94 +12,116.90
Douglas Gordon *1966 (43) UK 25 -3 141,386.69 +15,091.26
John Baldessari *1931 (78) US 26 +1 140,757.05 +20,575.23
Lawrence Weiner *1940 (69) US 27 +2 138,750.84 +21,368.36
Thomas Ruff *1958 (51) DE 28 -2 137,625.20 +15,076.09
William Kentridge *1955 (54) ZA 29 -4 137,068.42 +12,701.91
Alberto Giacometti 1901-1966 CH 30 -6 135,920.92 +11,241.70
Pierre Huyghe *1962 (47) FR 31 -3 133,741.38 +15,566.08
Salvador Dalí 1904-1989 ES 32 +1 131,515.44 +17,259.16
Jasper Johns *1930 (79) US 33 -2 129,080.01 +14,217.02
Dan Graham *1942 (67) US 34 +1 127,987.34 +16,031.30
Donald Judd 1928-1994 US 35 +4 122,663.95 +13,571.60
Anselm Kiefer *1945 (64) DE 36 ±0 122,646.28 +10,995.53
Mike Kelley *1954 (55) US 37 +5 122,544.26 +14,890.64
Paul Cézanne 1839-1906 FR 38 -6 122,330.50 +7,834.83
Damien Hirst *1965 (44) UK 39 +5 122,101.81 +15,704.24
Ernst Ludwig Kirchner 1880-1938 DE 40 +18 121,745.47 +22,837.97
Max Beckmann 1884-1950 DE 41 ±0 120,842.51 +13,027.52
Francis Alÿs *1959 (50) BE 42 +13 120,257.95 +21,021.65
Pipilotti Rist *1962 (47) CH 43 -6 119,845.22 +10,116.92
Jeff Wall *1946 (63) CA 44 -4 119,402.46 +11,029.67
Marina Abramovic *1946 (63) RS 45 +1 118,946.94 +13,697.20
Franz West *1947 (62) AT 46 -8 118,552.37 +9,215.15
Richard Serra *1939 (70) US 47 +1 117,162.76 +13,804.99
Fernand Léger 1881-1955 FR 48 +1 116,536.59 +13,194.74
Thomas Struth *1954 (55) DE 49 +1 115,293.18 +12,128.27
Alexander Calder 1898-1976 US 50 +3 114,819.18 +14,725.63
Vincent van Gogh 1853-1890 NL 51 -6 114,773.88 +9,362.89
Gilbert & George *1967 (42) UK 52 -9 114,652.94 +8,109.28
Nam June Paik 1932-2006 KR 53 -2 113,031.46 +12,696.13
Paul McCarthy *1945 (64) US 54 +5 112,153.48 +13,434.95
Gabriel Orozco *1962 (47) MX 55 -8 111,769.84 +7,665.10
Rosemarie Trockel *1952 (57) 56 +9 111,210.04 +14,729.22
Christian Boltanski *1944 (65) FR 57 -3 110,140.99 +10,261.59
Claes Oldenburg *1929 (80) SE 58 +2 109,904.81 +11,506.48
Bill Viola *1951 (58) US 59 -3 109,472.74 +10,279.45
Nan Goldin *1953 (56) US 60 -8 108,900.53 +8,638.82
Claude Monet 1840-1926 FR 61 -4 108,598.38 +9,518.89
Wolfgang Tillmans *1968 (41) DE 62 +7 108,442.76 +15,459.12
Edgar Degas 1834-1917 FR 63 -2 107,715.45 +9,371.75
Vito Acconci *1940 (69) US 64 +2 107,014.12 +10,931.49
Jeff Koons *1955 (54) US 65 -2 106,240.67 +8,883.42
Rodney Graham *1949 (60) CA 66 +8 106,051.94 +15,594.01
Yoko Ono *1933 (76) JP 67 +16 104,780.13 +17,224.20
Tacita Dean *1965 (44) UK 68 +2 104,489.16 +11,834.13
Ilya & Emilia Kabakov *1933 (76) US 69 -7 104,148.19 +6,215.32
Jackson Pollock 1912-1956 US 70 +3 103,741.54 +12,729.48
Tony Oursler *1957 (52) US 71 -7 103,724.04 +7,165.24
Jenny Holzer *1950 (59) US 72 -1 102,981.27 +10,459.08
Maurizio Cattelan *1960 (49) IT 73 +12 102,963.83 +15,771.25
Ellsworth Kelly *1923 (86) US 74 -7 102,897.58 +8,335.88
Willem de Kooning 1904-1997 NL 75 -3 101,248.17 +8,726.84
Felix Gonzalez-Torres 1957-1996 CU 76 +15 101,198.59 +14,603.15
Mona Hatoum *1952 (57) LB 77 -1 101,160.60 +11,053.77
Richard Prince *1949 (60) PA 78 -3 100,748.90 +10,519.81
Daniel Buren *1938 (71) FR 79 -11 100,231.47 +6,080.53
Frank Stella *1936 (73) US 80 -3 100,183.51 +10,465.32
Anri Sala *1974 (35) AL 81 +3 99,953.28 +12,483.23
Dieter Roth 1930-1998 DE 82 +4 99,538.29 +12,365.53
Yves Klein 1928-1962 FR 83 -1 98,959.02 +11,139.29
Valie Export *1940 (69) AT 84 +14 97,847.11 +13,517.29
Marcel Broodthaers 1924-1976 BE 85 -5 97,572.38 +9,436.62
Marlene Dumas *1953 (56) Ca 86 +11 97,513.39 +13,118.78
Rirkrit Tiravanija *1961 (48) AR 87 +6 97,209.19 +11,300.25
Cy Twombly *1928 (81) US 88 -1 96,644.75 +9,476.95
Liam Gillick *1964 (45) UK 89 +3 96,483.20 +10,203.65
Günther Förg *1952 (57) DE 90 -2 96,343.11 +9,465.98
Gordon Matta-Clark 1943-1978 US 91 +12 96,325.51 +14,565.35
Lucio Fontana 1899-1968 AR 92 +7 95,983.99 +11,800.63
Michelangelo Pistoletto *1933 (76) IT 93 +17 95,708.68 +15,532.99
David Hockney *1937 (72) UK 94 -4 95,536.90 +8,935.02
Thomas Hirschhorn *1957 (52) CH 95 -1 94,665.72 +8,830.96
Philip Guston 1913-1980 CA 96 -18 93,669.74 +4,548.85
Matthew Barney *1967 (42) US 97 -18 93,464.37 +4,633.59
Arnulf Rainer *1929 (80) AT 98 +26 93,174.78 +15,441.56
Marc Chagall 1887-1985 Vi 99 +33 92,128.76 +16,766.74
Robert Gober *1954 (55) US 100 -11 91,895.07 +5,273.66